A comment to yesterday's post Musings on Conversational Writing is so good I'm copying it here. Jeffrey Rubin, a fascinating person in his own right, says:
"Susan,
I agree that emails often don't rise to the level of genuine conversation - in which one is, in some important way, expanded - but I wonder if that is inherent in the form or more related to the spirit of the senders and the receivers? Could we - don't we - write some emails with a willingness to see the world from the different, and unique perspective, of the other person so that we might challenge our own cherished viewpoints? Then perhaps a generative dialogue might be stimulated...."
Jeffrey is right, of course. In fact, his comment illustrates the kind of thoughtful perspective that I stated is rarely the stuff of emails. He's right; I'm wrong. Perhaps because the majority of my email activities are associated with my business, my perspective is stunted. No, as I write this, I realize there is no "perhaps" here; my perspective IS stunted. Because the nature of business does not allow for such multi-layered, inquisitive introspection. Maybe I'll have to make a plan to write and read more email conversational exchanges in 2007.
I noted your post yesterday and loved the quote that said that we do better in a conversation when we go to it ready to emerge a different person.
I can apply that to so much of my everyday life: conversations, email, blog posts, comments on blogs, etc. Wonderful and provocative - thank you!
Posted by: Brett Rogers | December 28, 2006 at 04:35 PM
Susan,
Further reflections on genuine dialogues and emotional growth in cyberspace: Bloggers seem to have had an immense impact on the political landscape in 2006. I suspect many people think of this as "community." This trend certainly gave voice to diverse -- and previously neglected -- voices. The danger, however, in this form of communication might be that the emphasis is on SPEAKING OUT rather than LISTENING TO...
Posted by: Jeffrey B. Rubin | December 30, 2006 at 10:19 PM